Monday, April 23, 2012

Final Learning Blog


I know when writing these learning blogs we aren't really supposed to comment on the class itself but rather what we've learned. Quickly, I'd like to say how fortunate I've been in being in this specific English 101 class. Many of my friends are miserable in their classes because they feel they have been assigned "busy work" papers. That's my only comment on the class itself, that it has been very unlike any English class I've ever taken and I appreciate that.

Since this is a reflection post on the entire semester I'll go through each unit, saying what my big takeaway was. In the first unit we focused on giving worthwhile peer reviews. I learned to look at content over grammatical errors because fixing grammar is poor editing. It's the message of the paper that matters, not their misuse of commas. In my first learning blog I was in the midst of writing my Polar Plunge article, and I feel like that was a long time ago. I have learned so much more since then. For the second unit we got into groups and worked with various genres. From this I learned that you can never be too descriptive when writing a research proposal and design. After some confusion during the peer review session I saw that I needed to write as if my audience and Nicole had no idea what was going on. I tend to write under the assumption that everyone reading my papers knows whats going on, and that often will not be the case. Now when writing I put myself in the reader's shoes and try to be as descriptive and explanatory as possible. From working with genres so much, I now look around at the various genres that I come into contact with daily and think about it's constraints and how people conform to those rules. I look at how I change the way I speak and write based on those genres I'm communicating within. Unit three was an awesome project! I felt my most creative writing this paper and got to explore the way Facebook has changed communication (at least within Facebook itself). I learned to not be so superficial with my writings. My rough draft of the GRWJ article needed to go beyond the surface of the ways people communicate via Facebook and dig deeper. When revising I talked about how Facebook has changed the ways people talk to one another. For the third unit I also had to write an abstract, which is something I've never done before. It seems easy enough-you just sum up what your paper is about. I found that it is not that easy to find the right words to properly tell potential readers why they should pick your article. After writing my abstract over and over and having others sum up my article, I was able to write a decent abstract.


Friday, April 13, 2012

GWRJ notes/thoughts

Interview Questions/General Thoughts
*what are the expectations when you like a status that is supposed to give you something?
*what does the person creating the status get out of it?
*are people more inclined to give a picture/rating/truth when they are in a good mood?
*when asking for a rating and truth, do we feel it is the truth, or are we ok with a public rating that may be untrue?

focus
*i don't want to say people are "fake," but i want to talked about altered communication-maybe
manipulated interaction

notes for monday

bring: copies/computer for peers to look at, one hard copy for nicole

conference time: wednesday 8:40-8:50

Monday, April 9, 2012

unit three thoughts

For unit three we are writing an article that would belong in the GRWJ. I'm really excited about my topic, Facebook, because this can be an opinion piece and I get to be pretty creative. With that said, I'm a little nervous that my paper could come off as being too harsh. I don't want to seem like a snob, but the way people communicate via Facebook can be ridiculous sometimes. The way people talk and post is altered. If people were honest with their truth is, ratings, and thoughts, people would be in fights all the time. I feel like I still have a lot of kinks to work out but I've got some time.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

GWRJ proposal

1.       I will be writing about Facebook communication via statuses. I was thinking of giving my article the title of “Truth is: This is Getting Kind of Annoying,” but that may be too harsh. People make statuses daily that say “like my status for a quote/truth is/memory/picture/rate/video.” When people like these statuses, they aren’t expecting the truth-they want a compliment. Would they like these statuses and ask for a memory if it was going to be harsh? On the flip side of this, Facebook can make people bolder because they are hiding behind a screen.
2.       The genre I am exploring is Facebook.
3.       This article will be personal, but I will also interview others to get their opinions/experiences.
4.       The visuals I will use will be screen shots of the various statuses and posts regarding “Truth is,” LMS, ext.
5.       I will need to cite my interviews, and ask permission to show people’s Facebook pages, so I’m not sure how I will cite yet. I have a lot of kinks to work out still.

Title:
Truth is: I'd Like to Know How You Really Feel

Sunday, April 1, 2012

ten characteristics

- Both pieces of work used others writings to gain information/avoid repetition
- Writing is critical for both English and Biology majors
- Looked beyond general knowledge to understand subject at a deeper level

- Topics needed to be decided upon to write about (what part of biology, and what piece of literature)
- Needed evidence to support
- Both used Illinois State University resources (Professors, online databases)
- Research was vital for both
- Used scholarly journals/articles to gain information
- Long processes to be able to finish/publish writings
- Others had to approve their writings

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

final learning blog unit two

Something that I've learned is that you can never be too clear or descriptive when it comes to writing out a research proposal and design. I know what I want to say and what I am trying to say, but others don't so I should be more descriptive in my explanations. I came to this conclusion after the peer-review session. Some of the other group's research and steps confused me, and my research was unclear at times to them too. I've also learned that qualitative research can be explored from different angles (descriptive). When my group and I first began looking at research designs, I looked at quantitative research, but that focuses more on numbers. Qualitative looks at why something works the way it does. Writing the final research design is a little difficult because I feel like it's very redundant. Maybe that's just because I've been writing and editing the same information over and over. To get to the finished product, I've done a lot of brainstorming and analyzing of the normal rules we follow when it comes to essays and t-shirts. Essays are always written on paper, and t-shirts advertize or display some personal interests. My group and I had to take the risk of turning in an assignment on a t-shirt and hoping our professor took our work seriously. I wore my math chapter 3 study guide on my t-shirt around the dorms. Some people were really confused, and others thought it would be an excellent study tool.