·
Has a title/author
·
Intro
-who, what, when, where, why, conflict
·
Body
-content of article (interviews, proximity,
impact)
·
Conclusion
-what is going to happen, how it went in
the past
·
Unbiased information and interviews
-factual, not my opinon
·
Interviews (2) contain relevant information
-Interviews don’t ramble, are appropriately
placed, information is on topic
·
Contains a visual
·
Grammar
-informal, but accurate spelling,
punctuation, etc.
-word choice and tone are not
sophisticated (no big words), but easy to understand and casual/friendly
-meant to be read by students, so it is written to them
-contractions used
-meant to be read by students, so it is written to them
-contractions used
·
Citations (articles I analyzed, interviews)
-sources are credible
-works/interviews cited page (interviewee's name, phone number and articles web address)
-works/interviews cited page (interviewee's name, phone number and articles web address)
·
Most important information in the beginning of
the article
Your rubric looks good. You seem to have a good grasp on this concept. I think that you could probably push yourself a little more now and begin to consider just what makes something "informal," at least in relation to what we generally consider "formal" English, as well as consider what "sophisticated" even means examples. While these are all subjective terms, I wonder what you think about their meanings in relation to what you've found in your articles. You can also elaborate on the citations. How are they set up within the articles?
ReplyDelete